Watson Keeps Entertaining Sherlock Holmes Chugging Along
Christian Hamaker : Crosswalk.com Contributing Writer

DVD Release Date:  March 30, 2010 

Theatrical Release Date:  December 25, 2009

Rating:  PG-13 (for intense sequences of violence and action, some startling images and a scene of suggestive material)

Genre:  Mystery, Action/Adventure

Run Time:  128 min.

Director:  Guy Ritchie

Actors:  Robert Downey Jr., Jude Law, Rachel McAdams, Mark Strong, Eddie Marsan, Kelly Reilly, William Hope

In a year of popular franchise extensions (Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince) and reboots (Star Trek), who would have thought that the most satisfying entertainment of the lot would be a reinvention of Sherlock Holmes?

Popularized on film decades ago by Basil Rathbone and brought briefly back to the screen in the mid-1980s courtesy of producer Steven Spielberg and director Barry Levinson (The Young Sherlock Holmes), the cerebral detective wouldn't seem to have much of a niche to carve out among today's spectacle-driven audience, dominated by teens who have, at best, read one or two Holmes stories as part of their English classes.

Leave it to action producer Joel Silver (Die Hard, Lethal Weapon, The Matrix) to help bring the tale back to movie screens, with the title character reinvented as a Fight Club hobbyist who studies and practices the most effective body blows for defeating opponents twice his size.

Yes, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's detective has been reinvented for the Jason Bourne age—toned, good-looking and able to fight and win in fisticuffs or mind games with opponents who are imposing, to say the least. Adding to all the brawn and brains is a dash of romance with a former lady love, Irene Adler (Rachel McAdams). But the main chemistry is between Holmes (Robert Downey Jr.) and Dr. Watson (Jude Law), a sidekick who just can't kick the habit of helping Holmes solve another case.

The story opens as the duo finishes their supposed final case together. Watson, preparing to marry his fiancée (Kelly Reilly), is also moving his office from Holmes' digs at 221B Baker St., much to the chagrin of those who will be left behind with the erratic Holmes. The detective spends his evenings firing his pistol into his wall and otherwise creating a sense of dread and unease among the other residents.

Dread and unease define the mood of many Londoners who have come to believe that Lord Blackwell (Mark Strong)—executed for the murders of several women—has returned from the grave. Blackwell's whispered warning to Holmes about impending spiritual chaos following his death appears to be playing out. Through the overtures of Adler, who is rumored to be Holmes' equal in intellect, or perhaps his superior, Holmes is drawn into the mystery surrounding Blackwell.

The tale takes on macabre, even occult elements as it explores a secret society that Blackwell heads up, and his grandiose plans to reclaim the American colonies and conquer the world.

If the film has a notable misstep, it comes in keeping Watson off-screen for much of the story's final stretch. The playful tension between Holmes and Watson that defines the film's first half isn't matched by the interplay between Holmes and Adler, or Holmes and Blackwell. Only after Watson re-emerges does the film get back on track, building to an exciting, if predictable, finale.

Sherlock Holmes includes some disturbing spiritual material, and Holmes' ambivalence (at best) about religious faith is only reaffirmed in this tale. However, given the villain's religious hubris, the story's ending proves more satisfactory than offensive (Proverbs 3:34; 8:13; 11:2). This is a well-made entertainment, with the promise of even better chapters to come.

Page  «  <  >  »      1  2  
 
Add Your Comment
Please login to post your comment

Reader Comments
KJVO3/9/2010 7:26 PM
this film is excellent. Very entertaining for devout Sherlockians and action fans. SPOILER WARNING!!! The
"Satanic content" is proved to be nothing but a hoax at the end,-SPOILR OVER!!! in keeping with the Sherlock Holmes stories by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (and I've read every single one). It reminded me of the short story "The Sussex Vampire," in which Holmes & Watson are called to investigate a mother who may be a vsmpire, as her husband has seen her sucking her baby's blood, with her teeth on his neck, but it is eventually proved that she is innocent and there's no dark force at work. I didn't hear any cursing in the film, and other than some intense action-violence, the film is perfectly suitable for pre-teens. Also, the film uses plenty of quotes from previous Sherlock Holmes stories (as well as quoting Shakespeare, who coined the famous phrase "The game's afoot" in "Henry V") sure to please Sir Arthur himself. Very good movie. Can't wait for the sequel. 10/10
Login to Report This PostLogin to Report This Post

kyleauthor1/2/2010 12:02 AM
The clearly satanic symbology that is used by the magicians in this film is, in fact, highly frowned upon by Holmes, and is quite obviously shown in a negative light. Furthermore, the filmmakers weren't just going to make up magical symbols. Sherlock Holmes is set in the real world, and frankly, a lot of bad people (such as the villains in this film) use those symbols for evil. The fact that the filmmakers used them is not offensive to me in the least. It just made it that much more reallistic.
Login to Report This PostLogin to Report This Post

kyleauthor1/1/2010 11:57 PM
This was probably the single most accurate Holmes film that I have ever seen. hobbit4christ has obviously never read any of the books. If he had, he would have known that Holmes never once said "elementary my dear watson" and that Watson was no overweight blundering idiot as often portrayed in the films. This is the first Holmes movie to ever really capture the true essence of the books. In fact, the magic-related plot didn't seem out of place at all to me. (Sir Doyle had tried to convince the world that fairies existed shortly before his death, and was by no means a Christian writer. He was addicted to opium, just like Holmes in the books) I am very pleased with this film, and if there is ever a sequel, I will go. This was no reinvintion of the great detective, this was the great detective. If there is anyone at all who beleives that this film is not in the Holmes tradition, (s)he needs to stop watching the movies and pick up the books, (s)he'll find that (s)he was quite mistaken indeed.
Login to Report This PostLogin to Report This Post


Report This Post
Username:      If this isn't your username, click here.
Comment Author:
Comment:
Reason:
Priority:
Please type your explanation in the space below.
Report This Post
Your report has been sent.
free newslettersfree newsletters
Stay informed on the latest in pop culture from a Christian perspective
To receive email newsletters, updates and special offers from TheFish, select your newsletter(s), enter your email address and hit "Sign Up".
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Get the week’s highlights reviews, interviews and more!
  • The fastest entertainment features and blogs every day!
  • Catch the latest review of new films in the theater and on DVD.
  • All the latest reviews and artist interviews every week.
  • Our writers comment on the latest pop culture news.
AVERAGE READER RATING
How would you rate this article?
communitycommunity
 
Remember Me