
Perhaps the imbalance in personalities—a complex, corrupt president versus a lightweight TV interviewer—would have put anyone who played Frost at a disadvantage in this drama. Of course, the underdog aspect of Frost taking on Nixon is part of what makes the story intriguing, but it also makes for an unbalanced drama. We enjoy the suave Nixon, as portrayed superbly by Langella, even when he’s filibustering in response to Frost’s questions. On the other hand, watching Frost and his team squirm gets old. We sense that a payoff is coming, and when it does, it delivers. But the film’s denouement, indicating that Frost landed on the cover of two newsweeklies after the interview, feels oddly irrelevant. A reminder from Reston that Nixon’s most lasting legacy is that the suffix “gate” now gets attached to any presidential scandal is an oversimplification of the impact of Nixon’s presidency.
The filmmakers behind Frost/Nixon are promoting the film by trying to tie the abuse of Richard Nixon to events that occurred under the George W. Bush administration. In a time when the current president has received blame for anything and everything, such a strategy may prove wise in generating interest in the film, even if the parallels between Nixon and Bush can be disputed. Viewers can decided the merits of such an argument, but even those who disagree with the attempt to connect the two presidents will be able to appreciate Frost/Nixon as a fine drama that’s worth watching and pondering as a historical artifact.
Questions? Concerns? Contact the writer at crosswalkchristian@earthlink.net.
CAUTIONS:
free newsletters
